Home NEWS Columbia Won’t Participate in the Next U.S. News Rankings-EnglishHindiBlogs-News

Columbia Won’t Participate in the Next U.S. News Rankings-EnglishHindiBlogs-News

35
Rate this post


Columbia University will not participate in the next US News & World Report ranking of colleges across the country after a Columbia math professor questioned the accuracy of the data that secured its No. 2 spot in the influential ranking, the university said Thursday evening. familiar.

The deadline for submitting data for the ranking is Friday, and a university spokesperson said officials needed more time to analyze the data and address criticism from the professor, Michael Thaddeus.

In a provocative critique of 21 pages dr. Thaddeus wrote on his website in February that he questioned not only the data behind the assessment, but also the debate over whether college rankings — used by millions of prospective students and their parents — are valuable or even accurate.

“Columbia leaders are taking these questions seriously and we immediately began a review of our data collection and submission process,” Columbia’s provost, Mary C. Boyce, said in the announcement.

At the time, Columbia stood by his records, but Dr. Boyce said the university is “now closely monitoring our processes in light of the questions raised.”

“The ongoing review is a matter of integrity,” she continued. “We won’t take shortcuts to get it right.”

A Columbia spokesman, Ben Chang, said he would not speculate on when Columbia would rejoin the rankings.

For an Ivy League school like Columbia to withdraw from the rankings, even temporarily, is a blow to their reputation and could prompt other universities to reconsider their participation as well. Many college presidents complain that the ranking forces them to focus on statistics that are too simplistic what it takes to find a good match between a student and a school.

dr. Thaddeus said Thursday night the move raised a host of questions that Columbia had not yet answered.

“Is the university itself disapproving of the US News rankings?” he wrote in an email. “Will it also retreat in the coming years? Why can’t the work be completed? What was it about the questions I asked that apparently derailed the process?”

The university had “not provided substantive answers to the concrete issues I cited,” he added.

In Dr. Thaddeus’ critique, he cited evidence he collected and suggested that Columbia had made its undergraduate classes smaller, increased its educational expenditures, and raised its professors.

The next edition of the ranking is scheduled for September, officials said. To help prospective students without navigating it, said Dr. Boyce that in the fall Columbia was planning to publish a Common Data Set, a loosely standardized set of statistics used by higher education institutions. She said it would contain much of the same information contained in US News’ profiles.

dr. Thaddeus said he understood that Columbia had prepared such datasets in the past for its own internal use, but had not made them public.

“The point is, they have documents that would shed light on their previous US News submissions — and perhaps even reveal whether their misrepresentation was intentional or unintentional — but they refuse to make them public, even after an overwhelming majority of the faculty that voted. asked them to do that,” he said.

Mr. Chang, the spokesperson, declined to comment on Dr. Thaddeus on the Common Data Set, but noted Columbia’s promise to publish a dataset this fall. “The university has had a thorough process for a long time,” he said. “Our goal is maximum accuracy and transparency.”

Critics have said the US News formula tends to reward schools based on wealth and reputation.

In his analysis, Dr. Thaddeus, who specializes in algebraic geometry, said the key supporting data submitted by Columbia was “inaccurate, dubious, or highly misleading.”

This year, Columbia moved up one spot in the rankings to No. 2; the university was surpassed only by Princeton and tied to Harvard and MIT

dr. Thaddeus noted that Columbia was ranked 18th in 1988, a rise he said was remarkable. “Why have Columbia’s fortunes improved so dramatically?” he asked in his analysis.

Columbia isn’t the first university to question its ranking data.

This year the University of Southern California withdrew his school of education from the US News rankings due to inaccuracies in data going back five years. And a former dean of Temple University’s business school was found guilty last year of using fraudulent data between 2014 and 2018 to improve the school’s national rankings and boost revenue. The school’s online MBA program was ranked the best in the country by US News & World Report in its years of falsifying records.

Over the years, other schools such as Iona CollegeClaremont McKenna College and Emory University were found to have falsified or manipulated data.


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here